Skip to main content

Table 2 Injection process practices observed among observed staff who had injection role at Fayoum’s primary health care facilities, 2019

From: Assessment of safe injection awareness and practices among healthcare providers at primary health care facilities

Injection process practices observed

Type of injection

Lab investigation

N (%)

Vaccination

N (%)

Family planning

N (%)

Therapeutic injection

N (%)

Total sample

N (%)

P value

The provider cleaned his/her hands before preparing an injection (either water and soap or alcohol based hand rub (n = 520)

70(63.6)

174(53.9)

41(59.4)

10(55.6)

295(56.7)

0.33

The provider wore a new pair of gloves, n = 520

78(70.9)

120(37.2)

26(37.1)

11(61.1)

235(45.1)

.001*

N-patient brought his/her syringe and needle for the observed injection n = 520

98(89.1)

0(0)

59(85.5)

12(66.7)

169(32.5)

.001

Injections were prepared by aseptic technique in clean area n = 410

NA

323(100)

69(100)

18(100)

410(100)

The provider used a new syringe every time before procedure, n = 520

110(100)

323(100)

70(100)

18(100)

520(100)

Needle and syringe were used for only one patient

110(100)

323(100)

70(100)

18(100)

520(100)

The rubber cap on medication vial is disinfected with alcohol rub prior piercing n = 410

NA

190(58.5)

43(62.3)

10(55.6)

243(59.2)

0.07

Multi-dose vials were entered every time with a new needle and syringes n =323

NA

323(100)

NA

NA

323(100)

Multi-dose vials were dated when they had been first opened and discarded within 28 days unless there are some manufactured precautions, n = 323, p value

NA

260(80.5)

NA

NA

260(80.5)

A gauze barrier was used when breaking glass ampoules to avoid stick injuries n = 410

NA

169(52.3)

28(40)

16(88.9)

213(51.9)

.001*

Readymade sterile water or manufacture’s after for reconstitution of vials was use, n = 410

NA

287(88.9)

60(85.7)

12(66.7)

359(87.5)

.001*

The expire and validity of drugs exposure to heat or light was checked, n = 410

NA

260(80.5)

56(80)

12(66.7)

328(80)

.001*

The injection site was cleansed and/or disinfected before the injection, n = 520

78(70.9)

233(72.1)

50(71.2)

10(55.6)

371(71.2)

0.51

Aseptic non-touch technique for the vein was applied after preparation, n = 128

110(100)

NA

NA

18(100)

128(100)

After the procedure, the provider used a clean gauze pad and gently apply pressure to the puncture site to stop bleeding, n = 520

78(70.9)

152 (47.1)

35(50)

12(66.7)

277(53.2)

.001*

N-recapping of syringes was done by the provider n = 520

80(72.7)

248(76.8)

51(72.9)

6(33.3)

385(73.9)

.001*

After procedure, a needle remover or needle destroyer was used for each procedure, n = 520

0(0)

2(.6)

0(0)

0(0)

2(.6)

0.71

Immediate disposal of used needles and syringes in sharp box/container was done, n = 520

52(47.3)

273(84.5)

60(85.7)

12(66.7)

397(76.2)

.001*

After procedure, the provider cleaned the work area with disinfectant if there is blood or body fluid contamination, n = 520

96(87.3)

177(54.8)

41(58.6)

16(88.9)

330(63.3)

.001*

After procedure, the provider cleaned his/her hands (either water and soap or alcohol based hand rub), n = 520

86(78.2)

225(69.7)

50(71.4)

12(66.7)

373(71.6)

0.31

  1. N items that are negatively worded and the correct response is NO
  2. *P value ≤ 0.05 is considered significant